• About
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • MICE
Monday, June 23, 2025
Newsletter
SUBSCRIBE
  • Coffee News
  • Features
    • Industry issues
    • Interviews
    • Knowledge leader
  • Coffee community
    • Competitions
    • Events
    • Get to know
    • People
    • Sustainability
  • Industry insights
    • Café insights
    • Green bean
    • Manufacturers
    • Milk and alt milks
    • Roasters
  • Skills & education
    • Business advice
    • How to
    • Latte art
    • Recipes
    • Research
    • Tutorials
  • Equipment & tech
    • Automation
    • Coffee machines
    • Grinders
    • Milk steaming
    • Roasting technology
    • Technology
  • Café scene
    • Australian Capital Territory
    • New South Wales
    • Northern Territory
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Tasmania
    • Victoria
    • Western Australia
    • New Zealand
No Results
View All Results
  • Coffee News
  • Features
    • Industry issues
    • Interviews
    • Knowledge leader
  • Coffee community
    • Competitions
    • Events
    • Get to know
    • People
    • Sustainability
  • Industry insights
    • Café insights
    • Green bean
    • Manufacturers
    • Milk and alt milks
    • Roasters
  • Skills & education
    • Business advice
    • How to
    • Latte art
    • Recipes
    • Research
    • Tutorials
  • Equipment & tech
    • Automation
    • Coffee machines
    • Grinders
    • Milk steaming
    • Roasting technology
    • Technology
  • Café scene
    • Australian Capital Territory
    • New South Wales
    • Northern Territory
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Tasmania
    • Victoria
    • Western Australia
    • New Zealand
No Results
View All Results
Home Features Knowledge Leader

Socratic Coffee explains why size matters (Part II)

by Staff Writer
July 9, 2016
in Knowledge Leader
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In our last column, we attempted to show how the sizing of coffee particles is not a trivial exercise. Three-dimensional objects with diverse morphologies, geometries, and topographies are not easily quantified in a simple metric.

Size alone, without qualification, can be rather meaningless. In an effort to better communicate particle characteristics, particle technologists have developed at least five main geometrical size descriptions, as well as two dynamic statistical diameters.

However, how best to quantify the variety of shapes and sizes often encountered in materials is still an active discipline of scientific inquiry, as the answer typically depends on the application. Sizing particles is simply a means to an end, with the end being some correlation of the material’s properties with some process of its usage or preparation.

In coffee, shape and size are the most important characteristics that affect pore geometry, porosity (total pore volume), pore size distribution, and solid surface area – factors which impact extraction.

In this article, we will briefly discuss three different sizing techniques that are often used for coffee, looking at some advantages and disadvantages of each.

Sieving
“I often refer to sieving as the Cinderella of particle size analysis methods; it does most of the hard work and gets little consideration,” said Harold Heywood, a former Professor at the Imperial College of London and a recognised leader of modern particle sizing science.

It’s been recorded that the early Egyptians once used woven reeds and grasses to size grains. Though the level of sophistication and standardisation has increased since, the basic principles of sieving remain the same: fine materials are separated from coarser material by means of a mesh or perforated vessel. Sieves with smaller and smaller apertures can be stacked together, allowing a sample to filter through the various screens (see Figure 1). After movement of particles into the various sieves has ceased, the material contained within each sieve is weighed.

Note that the largest dimension may pass through a smaller pore size if the particle orients itself a certain way, so that it is classified by the second largest dimension. The particle in Figure 1 has one dimension of 430 micrometres, but is able to pass through the sieve with 400-micrometre pores. This is a known disadvantage of particle sizing via sieving. There is however, a potential to underestimate size characteristics of some particles.

Besides the “second largest dimension” sizing issue shown in Figure 1, some other concerns with sieving involve agglomeration (the tendency for materials to clump together due to their high moisture, high oil content, and/or irregular topography), blinding (plugging of screen openings), and electrostatic charges causing clinging of particles or increased agglomeration and blinding. Despite these concerns, the biggest advantages of sieving are the cost of equipment and the physical separation of particles that results.

Laser diffractometry
n Using the concept of light scattering, laser diffraction is a popular method for rapidly determining particle distribution. The basic principle of light diffraction is that small particles in the path of a light beam scatter the light in predictable patterns.

Based on the intensity pattern of the scattered light, as a function of the sample’s angle to the light source, it is possible to calculate the distribution of particles as they pass through the light source-detector array. Unlike the other two methods presented here, laser diffraction doesn’t look at each particle at once (that is, it’s not a counting method). Rather, it quickly measures the whole sample in what is called an ensemble method.

Commercial laser diffraction equipment utilises algorithms based on the Mie theory of light scattering. Underlying this theory are two important assumptions to consider: particles are smooth and particles are homogenous. Deviations from these assumptions may lead to various biases in the data, such as overestimating particles on the smaller and larger ends of the scale.

Let us return to the 3-D microscopic image of an actual coffee particle. See Figure 2. Note the potential deviations from spherical, smooth, and non-porous.

Further, Schenker and colleagues in the Journal of Food Science (2000) paper Pore structure of coffee beans affected by roasting conditions, use a variety of measurements (volumetry, mercury porosimetry, and electron microscopy) to demonstrate that the degree of roast has a significant impact on pore-structure development in coffee.

This article features in the August 2016 edition of BeanScene Magazine. To view the full article, subscribe here today: www.beanscenemag.com.au/subscribe or pick up your copy here.

Tags: coffee particlessciencesizeSocratic Coffee

Related Posts

Scott Bennett, Chairman of H.A. Bennett & Sons.

Scott Bennett reflects on coffee’s future

by Kathryn Lewis
June 16, 2025

Fresh from being honoured with the Lifetime Achievement Award at the Coffee Industry Heroes 2025, Scott Bennett reflects on more...

Giuseppe Cianchi

Giuseppe Cianchi: keeper of the flames

by Kathryn Lewis
February 17, 2025

Grinders Coffee Master Roaster Giuseppe Cianchi reflects on a quarter of a century in the industry and how Australian coffee...

Fulvio Pagani

Fulvio Pagani: a journey from pitch to cup

by Kathryn Lewis
December 17, 2024

As Rio Coffee celebrates 60 years in business, Founder Fulvio Pagani reveals how his soccer skills led him to establish...

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

BeanScene Magazine is committed to promoting, enhancing and growing the coffee industry in Australia as it’s coffee news has captured the attention of coffee roasters, bean and machine importers, café owners, café chain owners and executives, and many of the auxiliary products and services that support the coffee industry in Australia and around the globe.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Beanscene

  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Latest magazine
  • Terms & conditions
  • Privacy collection notice
  • Privacy policy

Popular Topics

  • Coffee news
  • Features
  • Coffee community
  • Industry insights
  • Skills & education
  • Equipment & tech
  • Cafe Scene

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
SUBSCRIBE
  • Coffee News
  • Features
    • Industry issues
    • Interviews
    • Knowledge leader
  • Coffee community
    • Competitions
    • Events
    • Get to know
    • People
    • Sustainability
  • Industry insights
    • Café insights
    • Green bean
    • Manufacturers
    • Milk and alt milks
    • Roasters
  • Skills & education
    • Business advice
    • How to
    • Latte art
    • Recipes
    • Research
    • Tutorials
  • Equipment & tech
    • Automation
    • Coffee machines
    • Grinders
    • Milk steaming
    • Roasting technology
    • Technology
  • Café scene
    • Australian Capital Territory
    • New South Wales
    • Northern Territory
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Tasmania
    • Victoria
    • Western Australia
    • New Zealand

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited